<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>T. Phaterpekar | Nunez Lab for Computational Mental Health &amp; Cancer Care</title><link>https://example.com/authors/t.-phaterpekar/</link><atom:link href="https://example.com/authors/t.-phaterpekar/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>T. Phaterpekar</description><generator>Wowchemy (https://wowchemy.com)</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Investigating fine-tuning versus zero-shot learning for general large language models when predicting cancer survival from initial oncology consultation documents</title><link>https://example.com/publication/cancer_survival_llm_finetuning/</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://example.com/publication/cancer_survival_llm_finetuning/</guid><description>&lt;p>This study investigates whether fine-tuning open-weight large language models (LLMs) improves cancer survival prediction from oncology consultation notes compared to zero-shot approaches. Using Meta&amp;rsquo;s Llama models on 59,800 patient records from BC Cancer, fine-tuning consistently improved performance over zero-shot inference, but did not outperform smaller task-specific NLP models. The findings suggest both approaches merit continued investigation, with the best choice depending on clinical context and practical constraints such as hardware, privacy, and deployment feasibility.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>